Comparative Surgical Outcomes of Schwannomas and Meningiomas Among Patients in the Cerebellopontine Angle in Pakistan: A Retrospective Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65761/pjcr.2025.2.2.15Keywords:
Schwannoma; Meningioma; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Cerebellopontine Angle; Surgical Outcomes; PakistanAbstract
Background: Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors, predominantly Schwannomas and Meningiomas, pose significant surgical challenges due to their proximity to cranial nerves and critical neurovascular structures. While the retrosigmoid approach is commonly employed for CPA tumor excision, tissue-based differences in surgical outcomes have not been extensively studied.
Objective: To evaluate histopathology-specific differences in tumor characteristics, extent of resection, and postoperative cranial nerve outcomes following retrosigmoid surgery for CPA tumors.
Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study involving 102 patients who were retrosigmoid resected CPA tumor between 2021 and 2024 in the Northwest School of Medicine, Peshawar, Pakistan. Demographics of the patients, the tumor nature, extent of resection, and postoperative complications were taken into consideration. The comparison of Schwannomas and Meningiomas was carried out by means of Chi-square and Fisher tests. The statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.
Findings: Of the cohort, 65 patients were found to have Schwannomas and 37 had Meningiomas. The total resection among Schwannomas and Meningiomas was gross in 89.2 and 100 percent respectively. There were no major differences in consistency or vascularity of the tumor. Facial nerve weakness was found in 20.0% of Schwannomas and in 5.4% of Meningiomas (p = 0.011) and loss of gag reflex in 18.5% of Schwannomas and none in Meningiomas (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: For patients with similar tumor characteristics and surgical resection, Schwannomas are linked with greater risks of postoperative cranial nerve deficits, in comparison to Meningiomas. These results demonstrate the significance of histopathology-specialized risk evaluation and intraoperative measures to save cranial nerve functions.
References
1. Abbasi MS, Ashraf I, Noor A, Zaman S, Shaukat A, Nagra BS. Frequency of burst abdomen and associated risk factors after emergency laparotomy in a tertiary care hospital from Rawalpindi. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2025;75(2):409. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i2.11868
2. Awtry J, Skinner S, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, Dey T, Duclos A, et al. Association between surgeon stress and major surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2025;160(3):332-40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6072
3. Azeem S, Ashraf M, Kamboh UA, Raza MA, Farooq M, Cheema HA, et al. Association of ABO blood group with delayed cerebral ischemia and clinical outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Pakistan. Asian J Neurosurg. 2023;18(1):108-16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1760859
4. Bola S, Osuji J, Rivero-Bosch M, Corbridge R. Airway management in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: a narrative review of current techniques and considerations. J Clin Med. 2025;14(13):4717. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134717
5. Brenner MJ, Pandian V. Elevating tracheostomy care through data-driven innovation: what can education, evidence-based practice, and quality improvement learn from one another? Tracheostomy (Warrenville). 2024;1(2):1.
6. Bur J, Wilson N, Lewis P, Missen K. Patient experiences during the planned perioperative care pathway: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2024;80(10):3886-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16071
7. Errico M, Luoma AM. Postoperative care of neurosurgical patients: general principles. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2023;24(5):282-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2023.03.011
8. Eskildsen SJ, Hansen CA, Kallemose T, Curtis DJ, Wessel I, Poulsen I. Factors associated with time to decannulation in patients with tracheostomy following severe traumatic brain injury. Respir Care. 2024;69(5):566-74. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11376
9. Khan AH, Afridi H, Tariq M. Early complications of open surgical tracheostomy. Indus J Biosci Res. 2024;2(2):1091-7. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.331
10. Liu S, Chi J, Cao H, Zhou X, Ma Q, Yang Y, et al. Massive subcutaneous emphysema and bilateral tension pneumothorax following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia: a case report. Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e07854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36005
11. Manjarrez E, editor. Perioperative and consultative medicine. Medical Clinics of North America, Vol 108. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2024.
12. Mao X, Zhou Y, Chen Q, Zhang Y. Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1455926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1455926
13. Milinis K, Hampton T, Lau AS, Sharma SD. Oxford case histories in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780192888709.001.0001
14. Mohamed Y. Early versus delayed tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [dissertation]. Kansas City (MO): University of Missouri-Kansas City; 2020.
15. Mu J, Wang T, Ji M, Yin Q, Wang Z. Tracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(8):3033-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17116
16. Muscat K, Sood S. Percutaneous tracheostomy and open standard surgical tracheostomy. In: Brown JS, editor. Atlas of head and neck surgery. 2nd ed. Cham (CH): Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36593-5_4
17. Nadeem U, Fatima T, Farooq A, Hassan U, Ahmed A. Early tracheostomy versus late tracheostomy in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Asian J Neurosurg. 2024;19(3):439-44. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787794
18. Newman HM. Choosing the right tracheostomy tube for adults in intensive care: size matters [dissertation]. London (GB): UCL (University College London); 2024.
19. Nsanzimana JD. Epidemiological profile and factors influencing the short term postoperative outcomes of thoracic surgical conditions treated at tertiary hospitals in Rwanda [dissertation]. Kigali (RW): University of Rwanda; 2022.
20. Ochoki NO. Factors associated with adherence to tracheostomy care guidelines among critical care nurses at Kenyatta National Hospital [dissertation]. Nairobi (KE): Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; 2022.
21. Robinson CP, Aysenne A. Postoperative neurosurgical complications in neurocritical care. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2025;27(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-024-00813-7
22. Roser SM, Bouloux GF. Medical management and preoperative patient assessment. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD, editors. Peterson’s principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 4th ed. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. p. 19-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91920-7_2
23. Scheller LL. Neighborhood-level disparities and health outcomes among children on long-term mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy [dissertation]. San Francisco (CA): UCSF; 2025.
24. Selekwa M, Maina I, Yeh T, Nkya A, Ncogoza I, Nuss RC, et al. Tracheostomy care quality improvement in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(11):e0002294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002294
25. Soliman SI, Panuganti BA, Francis DO, Pang J, Klebaner D, Asturias A, et al. Factors associated with otolaryngologists performing tracheotomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(12):1066-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2023.2698
26. Strober W, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF, Rohlfing ML. Tracheostomy incidence and complications: a national database analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;171(5):1379-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.843
27. Tanaka A, Uchiyama A, Kitamura T, Sakaguchi R, Komukai S, Matsuyama T, et al. Association between early tracheostomy and patient outcomes in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study. J Intensive Care. 2022;10(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00610-x
28. Twose P, Cottam J, Jones G, Lowes J, Nunn J. A 5-year review of a tracheostomy quality improvement initiative: reducing adverse event frequency and severity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;171(2):609-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.736
29. Urdaneta F, Tsai YC, Parotto M. Airway management in the neurointensive care unit. In: Mahanna-Gabrielli E, O'Phelan KH, Kumar MA, Levine J, Le Roux P, Gabrielli A, et al., editors. Textbook of neurointensive care: volume 2: perioperative management, monitoring, pharmacotherapy. 3rd ed. Cham (CH): Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62224-3_4
30. Wang RY, Son EL, Fuller CD, Gross ND. Head and neck. In: Yeung SCJ, Escalante CP, Pagel RFGS, editors. Oncologic emergency medicine: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Cham (CH): Springer Nature Switzerland; 2021. p. 247-57.
31. Wasim MF, Riaz N, Aslam S, Bukhari SMAS, Mumtaz H, Ahmed W. Complications of tracheostomy and leading factors among patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital, Karachi. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(3):775-8.
32. Zhao J, Yao Y, Fang L, Zhou H, Zhou J. Early tracheostomy for neurologic critical care patients improves neurologic function and reduces pulmonary infections. Am J Transl Res. 2024;16(11):6727-35. https://doi.org/10.62347/WQJA8819
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asif Khan, Rehan Ullah Jan, Muhammad Daniyal Khan, Abdul Qadeer (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
