Effect of Electronic Health Record Use on Nursing Documentation Quality and Workflow Efficiency at Nishtar Hospital Multan: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65761/pjcr.2026.287Keywords:
Electronic Health Records, Nursing Records, Workflow, Quality of Health Care, Cross-Sectional StudiesAbstract
Background: The global transition from paper-based to electronic health records (EHRs) has transformed nursing documentation, offering potential improvements in documentation quality, patient safety, and workflow efficiency. However, evidence from resource-constrained settings such as Pakistan remains limited. This study evaluated the impact of EHR use on nursing documentation and workflow efficiency at Nishtar Hospital Multan. To assess the effect of EHR use on documentation quality and workflow efficiency among nurses at Nishtar Hospital Multan, Pakistan.
Methods: A cross-sectional study included 320 registered nurses from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency departments. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire comprising demographic characteristics, the Nursing Documentation Quality Assessment Scale (NDQAS), and Workflow Efficiency Scale (WES). Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression were performed using SPSS version 27.
Results: Mean documentation quality was 68.4 ± 12.7/100, indicating moderate quality, while workflow efficiency averaged 58.2 ± 14.3/100. EHR use was significantly associated with improved documentation completeness (β = 0.34, p < 0.001) and accuracy (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), but also increased documentation time (β = −0.22, p = 0.003) and perceived burden (β = −0.31, p < 0.001). Trained nurses had significantly higher documentation quality (74.6 ± 10.2 vs. 63.8 ± 13.1) and workflow efficiency (64.1 ± 12.4 vs. 53.7 ± 14.8; both p < 0.001). Major barriers included inadequate training (62.5%), technical problems (41.3%), and poor usability (38.8%).
Conclusion: EHRs improve documentation completeness and accuracy but may increase documentation time and workload. Effective implementation requires comprehensive training, improved usability, technical support, and organizational support.
References
1. Lee M, Kim K, Shin Y, Lee Y, Kim TJ. Advancements in electronic medical records for clinical trials: enhancing data management and research efficiency. Cancers. 2025 May 2;17(9):1552.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091552
2. Saberi MA, Mcheick H, Adda M. From data silos to health records without borders: a systematic survey on patient-centered data interoperability. Information. 2025 Feb 5;16(2):106.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020106
3. Al‐Khasawneh MA, Faheem M, Alarood AA, Habibullah S, Alzahrani A. A secure blockchain framework for healthcare records management systems. Healthcare Technology Letters. 2024 Dec;11(6):461-70.
https://doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12092
4. Kemp J, Shin HD, Pape C, Lee A, Bahri B, Wang W, et al. Variations in nursing documentation time in a mental health setting: A retrospective observational study of EHR usage data. Appl Clin Inform. 2025;16(5):1799-814.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2750-4422
5. Sjöberg M, Edberg AK, Rasmussen BH, Beck I. Documentation of older people’s end-of-life care in the context of specialised palliative care: a retrospective review of patient records. BMC palliative care. 2021 Jun 24;20(1):91.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00771-w
6. Song W, Kang MJ, Zhang L, Jung W, Song J, Bates DW, Dykes PC. Predicting pressure injury using nursing assessment phenotypes and machine learning methods. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021 Apr 1;28(4):759-65.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa336
7. Wahyuni ED, Nursalam N, Dewi YS, Arifin H, Benjamin LS. Electronic nursing documentation for patient safety, quality of nursing care, and documentation: A systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Sep;74(9).
https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.9996
8. Olakotan O, Samuriwo R, Ismaila H, Atiku S. Usability challenges in electronic health records: impact on documentation burden and clinical workflow: a scoping review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70189.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70189
9. Nantschev R, Ammenwerth E. Challenges using electronic nursing routine data for outcome analyses: a mixed methods study. International journal of nursing sciences. 2022 Jan 1;9(1):92-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.11.003
10. Alkasasbeh M, Limbong K, Ismail VN. Advancing nursing documentation through electronic health records, standardized terminologies, and artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Nursing Forum. 2025.
https://doi.org/10.1155/nuf/3454699
11. Jamil F, Ahmad S, Iqbal N, Kim DH. Towards a remote monitoring of patient vital signs based on IoT-based blockchain integrity management platforms in smart hospitals. Sensors. 2020 Apr 13;20(8):2195.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082195
12. Adibi S, Rajabifard A, Shojaei D, Wickramasinghe N. Enhancing healthcare through sensor-enabled digital twins in smart environments: A comprehensive analysis. Sensors. 2024 Apr 27;24(9):2793.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092793
13. Corbett S, Maruthu R, Saab MM, Lehane E. Nurses' Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers to Their Acceptance of Electronic Health Records: A Mixed‐Method Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2025 Aug;34(8):3085-100.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17736
14. Kaihlanen AM, Gluschkoff K, Saranto K, Kinnunen UM, Heponiemi T. The associations of information system's support and nurses' documentation competence with the detection of documentation-related errors: Results from a nationwide survey. Health Informatics J. 2021 Oct-Dec;27(4):14604582211054026.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211054026
15. Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):327.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327
16. Provenzano M, Cillara N, Curcio F, Pisu MO, González CI, Jiménez-Herrera MF. Electronic health record adoption and its effects on healthcare staff: A qualitative study of well-being and workplace stress. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2024 Oct 28;21(11):1430.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111430
17. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette. The role of electronic health records in improving pediatric nursing care: A systematic review. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-024-00318-7
18. Firmansyah D, Kamaluddin R. Efektivitas penggunaan asuhan keperawatan: A systematic review. Holistik J Kesehatan. 2025;19(1):195-204.
https://doi.org/10.33024/hjk.v19i1.808
19. Ștefan AM, Rusu NR, Ovreiu E, Ciuc M. Empowering healthcare: a comprehensive guide to implementing a robust medical information system—components, benefits, objectives, evaluation criteria, and seamless deployment strategies. Applied System Innovation. 2024 Jun 14;7(3):51.
https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7030051
20. Dubé M, Hron JD, Biesbroek S, Chan-MacRae M, Shearer A, Landi R, Swenson M, Kats DJ, White D, Birmingham R, Coogle L. Human factors and systems simulation methods to optimize peri-operative EHR design and implementation. Advances in Simulation. 2025 Apr 23;10(1):23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00349-z
21. Anaraki NR, Mukhopadhyay M, Patey C, Norman P, Jewer J, Etchegary H, Hurley O, Walsh A, Senior DM, Wang PP, Asghari S. Factors influencing SurgeCon implementation in four Canadian emergency departments guided by consolidated framework for implementation research. Plos one. 2025 Dec 2;20(12):e0337389.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337389
22. Gawthorne J, Curtis K, McCloughen A. The Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Nurse‐Initiated Protocols in the Emergency Department: A Focus Group Study. Journal of clinical nursing. 2025 Jun;34(6):2375-85.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aiza Khan, Mobina Nawaz, Noor Ul Eman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
