Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Radiography in Evaluation of Lumbar Disc Degeneration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65761/pjcr.2026.333Keywords:
Lumbar disc degeneration; Digital radiography; Diagnostic accuracy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Intervertebral discAbstract
Background: Lumbar disc degeneration is a common structural cause of low back pain. Digital radiography is still a primary imaging modality for evaluation of structural changes in the intervertebral disc because of its easy availability and low radiation dose; however, the quantified data regarding its diagnostic accuracy compared with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is limited.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 patients aged 18-50 years with chronic low back pain who were subjected to weight-bearing PA and lateral digital radiography and MRI at Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan, Pakistan. Radiographic features (disc space narrowing, disc height, osteophytes, endplate sclerosis) were assessed and MRI findings were graded according to the Pfirrmann classification. Diagnostic performance measures were computed. The reporting was organized based on the STARD 2015 guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies.
Results: Digital radiography demonstrated sensitivity of 78.41% (95% CI: 68.36–86.47%), specificity of 87.50% (95% CI: 71.01–96.49%), positive predictive value of 94.95%, negative predictive value of 57.46%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 80.68% (Youden index 0.659; LR+ 6.27, LR− 0.25). ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis showed an AUC (area under curve) of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.750–0.892). The disc height on digital radiography were measured at three different levels: anterior, central and posterior. The highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0.850; 95% CI: 0.761–0.939) was obtained for posterior disc height with an optimal cut-off of ≤8.25 mm (sensitivity 86.4%, specificity 78.1%).
Conclusion: Digital radiography aids initial assessment of lumbar disc degeneration, while MRI detects occult pathology in symptomatic patients with normal radiographs, emphasizing its complementary diagnostic role.
References
Tayyab M, Faisal S, Ahmad Z, Ahmad M, Tanveer M, Shah S, et al. Burden and trends of low back pain in Pakistan: a Global Burden of Disease study, 1990-2021. Cureus. 2025;17(9). doi:10.7759/cureus.93105.
2. Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18):2151-2161. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c.
3. Risbud MV, Shapiro IM. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: pain and disc content. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(1):44-56. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2013.160.
4. Urban JPG, Roberts S. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5(3):120-130. doi:10.1186/ar629.
5. Pye SR, Reid DM, Lunt M, Adams JE, Silman AJ, O'Neill TW. Lumbar disc degeneration: association between osteophytes, end-plate sclerosis and disc space narrowing. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(3):330-333. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.052522.
6. Hoffeld K, Lenz M, Egenolf P, Weber M, Heck V, Eysel P, et al. Patient-related risk factors and lifestyle factors for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review. Neurochirurgie. 2023;69(5):101482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101482.
7. Battié MC, Videman T, Parent E. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(23):2679-2690. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146457. 83240.eb.
8. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811-816. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4173.
9. Brinjikji W, Diehn FE, Jarvik JG, Carr CM, Kallmes DF, Murad MH, et al. MRI findings of disc degeneration are more prevalent in adults with low back pain than in asymptomatic controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(12):2394-2399. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4498.
10. Arnone PA, McCanse AE, Farmen DS, Alano MV, Weber NJ, Thomas SP, et al. Plain radiography: a unique component of spinal assessment and predictive health. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(6):633. doi:10.3390/healthcare12060633.
11. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Kramer M, Hartwig E. Height of lumbar discs measured from radiographs compared with degeneration and height classified from MR images. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(2):263-269. doi:10.1007/s003300000556.
12. Madan SS, Rai A, Harley JM. Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine. Iowa Orthop J. 2003; 23:51-56.
13. Suthar P, Patel R, Mehta C, Patel N. MRI evaluation of lumbar disc degenerative disease. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4). doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11927.5761.
14. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873-1878. doi:10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011.
15. Raastad J, Reiman M, Coeytaux R, Ledbetter L, Goode AP. The association between lumbar spine radiographic features and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;44(5):571-585. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.006.
16. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology. 2015;277(3):826-832. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151516.
17. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K. Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(1):27-35. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0759-4.
18. Oh CH, Yoon SH. Whole spine disc degeneration survey according to the ages and sex using Pfirrmann disc degeneration grades. Korean J Spine. 2017;14(4):148-154. doi:10.14245/kjs.2017.14.4.148.
19. Di Muzio B, Adel K. Pfirrmann grading system (spine). Reference article. Radiopaedia.org. 2014 Feb 25 [revised 2026 May 30]. doi:10.53347/rID-27904.
20. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166(1):193-199. doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336678.
21. Chen X, Sima S, Sandhu HS, Kuan J, Diwan AD. Radiographic evaluation of lumbar intervertebral disc height index: an intra and inter-rater agreement and reliability study. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;103:153-162. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.018.
22. Lin PC, Chang WS, Hsiao KY, Liu HM, Shia BC, Chen MC, et al. Development of a machine learning algorithm to correlate lumbar disc height on X-rays with disc bulging or herniation. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(2):134. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14020134.
23. Urrutia J, Besa P, Campos M, Cikutovic P, Cabezon M, Molina M, et al. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2728-2733. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4438-z.
24. Herlin C, Kjaer P, Espeland A, Skouen JS, Leboeuf-Yde C, Karppinen J, et al. Modic changes-their associations with low back pain and activity limitation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200677.
25. Borenstein DG, O'Mara JW Jr, Boden SD, Lauerman WC, Jacobson A, Platenberg C, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(9):1306-1311. doi:10.2106/00004623-200109000-00002.
26. Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L, Sorensen JS, Bendix T. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(10):1173-1180. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000162396.97739.76.
27. Watanabe T, Otani K, Sekiguchi M, Konno SI. Relationship between lumbar disc degeneration on MRI and low back pain: a cross-sectional community study. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2022;68(2):97-107. doi:10.5387/fms.2022-17
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Umair Hassan, Abdul Sammad Ali Khan Shirwany, Sumaira Noor Malik, Sehrish Khakwani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
